Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Haddock-Engineers, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 21, 1954No. 14066PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, seeks enforcement of its order against Haddock-Engineers, Limited, hereafter the Company, and Operative Plasterers’ and Cement Masons’ International Association, AFL Local Union 797, hereafter the Union. The Company does not resist the enforcement.
The Board’s complaint against the Union alleged its jurisdictional requirement that it was engaged in commerce, in paragraph II of its complaint, as follows: “II. Respondent Company is engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.” The defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pittsburgh S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. W. B. Jones Lumber Company, Inc., and Lumber and Sawmill Workers' Union, Local 2288, AFLCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 12Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. Haddock-EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954