Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 13, 1938No. 8712PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

We held in this case that the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity were not abolished by the National Labor. Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. We adhere to this ruling, notwithstanding the provision that, in proceedings before the Board, such rules shall not be controlling. The Board is not a court, though it is quasi-judicial in character. It is a fact-finding tribunal with inquisitorial ^ powers in labor controversies, similar to those of a grand jury in criminal cases. In the discretion of the agency conducting the hearing, any person may…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Martel Mills Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  3. Donnelly Garment Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  5. Union Drawn Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API