Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1938No. 8712PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner seeks to enforce its order against respondent under section 10 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 151 et seq. and 160(c). The jurisdiction of this court is based upon section 10(e) of the act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e).
The nature of the business of respondent, as affecting interstate commerce, was described by this court in a prior decision involving an order of the Board against this respondent and two other oil companies who were jointly operating a repressure plant. The jurisdictional facts here are not materially different…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- In Re the National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Martel Mills Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
- Texarkana Bus Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sterling Electric Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.