Legal Opinion

Prince v. Poole

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 27, 2006No. 1030755PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Robert F. Prince, The Prince Law Firm, P.C., Charles E. "Ward" Pearson, P.C., and Charles E. Pearson appeal from a summary judgment entered by the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court in favor of Phil Poole on his breach-of-contract claims in this action. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

Beginning in 1999, 38 individual plaintiffs filed 22 separate lawsuits involving claims for damage allegedly caused by an underground gasoline spill in or near Moundville…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. John Balderston and John Gabriel v. Fairbanks Morse Engine Division of Coltec Industries, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Pavilion Development v. Jbj PartnershipSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Giles v. Brookwood Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Gooden v. City of TalladegaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Brown v. W.P. Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Poole v. PrinceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API