Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Grundy

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 10, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04645Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 John Hastings, No. CV-19-4645-PHX-DGC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 vs. 12 Elvin Garry Grundy, III; and The Grundy Law Firm, PLLC, 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 On May 12, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should 17 not be dismissed for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Doc. 17. Plaintiff was 18 required to file a response to the Order to Show Cause by June 5, 2020. Id. at 1, 5. The 19 Court warned Plaintiff that his case would be dismissed if he failed to file a response. Id. 20 at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Newgen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. United Investors Life Insurance Company v. Waddell & Reed Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Moore v. Maricopa County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API