Legal Opinion
Moore v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 2011No. 10-16736PublishedCited by 342 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Larry L. Moore is a frequent filer of lawsuits and is indigent. In this action, Plaintiff seeks money damages and other relief against Defendant Maricopa County Sheriffs Office resulting from alleged mistreatment of Plaintiff when he was a prisoner. As Plaintiff had done several times before, he sought to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this case. The district court held that four previous actions filed by Plaintiff qualified as “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and, therefore, denied Plaintiff IFP status. Plaintiff timely appeals. Because only…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by342 opinions
- Eric Knapp v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Washington v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Kasey Hoffmann v. L. PulidoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Childs v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Spencer v. BarajasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
337 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.