Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 2, 2010No. 37112-0-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

243 P.3d 941 (2010)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Dedrick Demond THOMAS, Appellant.

No. 37112-0-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

December 2, 2010.

Rebecca Wold Bouchey, Attorney at Law, Mercer Island, WA, for Appellant.

Michelle Luna-Green, Pierce Co. Pros. Attorney, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

PENOYAR, C.J.

¶ 1 Dedrick Demond Thomas appeals his eight witness tampering convictions, arguing that his multiple telephone calls to a single witness should be treated as one unit of prosecution for double jeopardy purposes. Applying State v. Hall, 168 Wash.2d 726, 230 P.3d 1048 (2010), we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VikeWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Of Washington v. Robert MaddausCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API