Legal Opinion

State v. Vike

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1994No. 59667-1PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Lasse Vike challenges a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming his sentences on two counts of possession of a controlled substance. The two counts stemmed from Vike’s simultaneous possession of two different controlled substances: heroin and clonazepam. Vike pleaded guilty to both counts. In computing his sentence, the trial court scored each count as a separate offense. The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that the two crimes did not encompass the same criminal conduct. In light of our recent decision in State v. Garza-Villarreal, 123 Wn.2d 42, 864 P.2d 1378 (1993), we reverse and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. StaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. LessleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. CollicottWashington Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1997

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API