Legal Opinion

Clifford v. City of Cheyenne

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1971No. 3939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Plaintiffs on July 6, 1970, commenced an action against the City of Cheyenne and its officers, seeking to enjoin the enactment of an ordinance providing for a partial vacation of a street identified as Omaha Road on the basis that the proposed vacation was without benefit to the city or the public and users of the street and was for the sole and exclusive benefit of the owners and operators of the K-Mart store. In disposing of the litigation the trial court in its memorandum opinion determined that the vacation was for a public purpose and the determination by the city council to vacate that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Palisades Properties, Inc. v. BrunettiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. State Highway Commission v. PetersWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  3. CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. County of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Uhls v. State Ex Rel. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Slawson v. Alabama Forestry Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Opinion to the GovernorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  3. Eastland Woods v. City of TallmadgeOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sears v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API