Legal Opinion

Slawson v. Alabama Forestry Com'n

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 1994No. 1921309PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bart Slawson and Naomi Furman appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, the Alabama Forestry Commission ("the Commission"); individual members of the Commission; and Bill Moody, the Alabama state forester. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

A summary judgment is appropriate when (1) there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and (2) the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c)(3), Ala.R.Civ.P. Because the parties do not dispute the facts in this case, we must determine whether the trial court properly applied the law to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hough v. StembridgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ellard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Ex Parte EllardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Town of LowndesboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. WATER WORKS AND SEWER BOARD OF SELMA v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Chapman v. GoodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Underwood v. Alabama State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. ALABAMA DEM v. Town of LowndesboroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API