Legal Opinion

Terry v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 12, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). At the outset it may be stated that, in respect to corporate names, the same rule applies as to the names of firms or persons, and an injunction lies to restrain the use by one corporation or firm of the name of a prior, corporation which tends to create confusion, and to enable the later corporation or firm to obtain, by reason of the similarity of names, the business of the prior one. Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co., 144 N. Y. 462, 39 N. E. 490, 27 L. R. A. 42; Brunson v. Reinberger & Collier, 134 Ark. 211, 203 S. W. 269; McLean v. Fleming, 96 U.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Donnell v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Securities Co. v. Federal Securities Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Jarvaise Academy of Beauty Culture v. St. Paul Institute of Cosmetology, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Mims v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Peterson v. BohannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API