Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. Harry Nace Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. (the plaintiff) brought suit alleging violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2 and Arizona law. The defendants were distributors and exhibitors of moving pictures and persons connected with these activities. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for trial.
BACKGROUND
The issues on this appeal arise out of an earlier case, Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 (9th Cir.1988) (Harkins I), cert. denied sub…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Billy R. Shapley v. Nevada Board of State Prison Commissioners, an Administrative BodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation, Columbia Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morton Nesses v. Randall T. ShepardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Single Chip Systems Corp. v. Intermec IP Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C. v. Autozone, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. Harry Nace CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.