Legal Opinion
Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 21, 2009No. Civ. 08-779-SLRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Cordis Corporation (“plaintiff’) filed this patent infringement action against Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Seimed Inc. (“defendants”) on October 17, 2008 following defendants’ announcement that they had received FDA approval for their drug-coated coronary stent, the Taxus Liberté. (D.I. 1) Plaintiff asserted causes of action for infringement of claim 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,895,406 (the “Gray patent”) and for a declaratory judgment of infringement of the Gray patent, based upon defendants’ pre-launch activities. Id.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Marchon Eyewear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Brain Life, LLC v. Elekta Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Technology Licensing Corp. v. Thomson, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- SV International, Inc. v. Fu Jian Quanyu Industry Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011