Legal Opinion
State v. Darrah
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided November 10, 1969No. 54389PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
This appeal involves the constitutionality of that part of the motor vehicle registration and licensing law relating to the operation of motor vehicles, particularly subdivision 3 of Section 302.020 making it unlawful to operate a motorcycle without wearing protective headgear:
“Every person operating or riding as a passenger on any motorcycle, as defined in Section 301.010, RSMo, upon any highway of this state shall wear protective headgear at all times the vehicle is in motion.” (RSMo Supp. Sec. 302.-020, subd. 3.)
The question arose and is presented in these…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Everhardt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- Bisenius v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Penney v. City of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Commonwealth v. KautzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Cesin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.