Legal Opinion
Paul G. v. Monterey Peninsula Unified School District
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 21, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-05582-BLFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge
Severely impacted by Ms autism, Plaintiff Paul G. (“Paul”) requires placement in a residential treatment facility that specializes in educating autistic students aged 18 to 22, which was not available in his home state of California. First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) ¶¶ 15, 28, ECF 25. As a result, Plaintiff Paul G. brings this suit against the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District and California Department of Education, alleging various claims for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- S.B. v. Cal. Dep't of Educ.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Tamalpais Union High School District v. D. W.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Sophie G. ex rel. Kelly G. v. Wilson County SchoolsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- A.H., a minor child, by and through their parent and legal guardian, D.H. v. NAMPA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 131; IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE; IDAHO STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; and DOES I-VDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
- J.C. v. San Juan Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022