Tamalpais Union High School District v. D. W.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND AFFIRMING ALJ’S DECISION IN ITS ENTIRETY
Re: Dkt. Nos. 43, 44
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge
Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Tamalpais Union High School District’s (“Tamalpais” or “District”) and Defendant minor D.W.’s cross-motions for summary *1154judgment filed on February 6, 2017. Dkt. Nos. 43, 44.1 Each party filed its opposition on February 23, 2017. Dkt. Nos. 45,- 46. The Court held a hearing on March 30, 2017. Dkt. No. 52. The Court DENIES each motion,- and affirms the ALJ’s decision, for the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Winkelman Ex Rel. Winkelman v. Parma City School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. RE-1Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Parents of Student W, Individually and as Guardians Student W, a Minor v. Puyallup School District, No. 3Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- D.O. v. Escondido Union School Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- E.E. v. Norris School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023