Legal Opinion

Shoudy v. Reeser

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1914No. 3,354PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Ravalli Comity; R. Lee McCulloch, Judge. Action by J. E. Shoudy against P. H. and Julia K. Beeser. From a judgment for plaintiff and an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bbantly

Action for damages for fraud practiced by the defendants upon the plaintiff in the sale to him of 120 acres of land situate in Bavalli county. Defendants are husband and wife. The fraud alleged is that defendants knowingly and falsely represented to the plaintiff that the area sold to him included sixty-five to seventy acres of bench land, whereas it included only thirty-five acres; that defendants further, by collusion with the agents of plaintiff, suppressed this fact, and that by reason of the false representations so made, upon which he relied, and by reason of the suppression of the fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Power & Bro., Ltd. v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Fruit Dispatch Co. v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bender v. Kingman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Reynolds v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  2. Koch v. RhodesMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Stillwell v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Kloppenburg v. MaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API