Legal Opinion

Bender v. Kingman & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1901No. 9,810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court for Thurston county. Tried below before Evans, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

This is an action of replevin involving possession of a *470stock of agricultural implements taken by defendants under attachments against Weiser Bros, and claimed by plaintiff as their vendee. The facts with respect to the transfer from Weiser Bros, to Bender are sufficiently set forth in the opinion in Kingman & Co. v. Weiser Bros., 48 Nebr., 834. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendants, and such action and the receiving of testimony as to certain admissions made by Weiser Bros, are assigned as error.

Under section 20, chapter 32, Compiled Statutes, it is undoubtedly true…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shoudy v. ReeserMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bender v. Kingman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Wilcox v. County of PerkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API