Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano

*430OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant mortgagee challenges dismissal of its mortgage-foreclosure action due to lack of respondent mortgagor’s husband’s signature on the mortgage. Because mortgagor’s husband validly conveyed, without limitation, all interest he had in the property before mortgagor signed the mortgage, the district court erred by concluding that husband’s signature was required on the mortgage, and we reverse.

FACTS

The facts in this case are not in dispute. In a dissolution-of-marriage action in 2003 or 2004, respondent Anne K. Detlefson-Delano (wife) was awarded all interest in…