Legal Opinion

Ogletree v. Cathrall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1964No. 40773PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

It has been held that under Code § 85-1609 relating to processioning “it will be seen that the protest allowed by law to be filed is to be returned to the clerk of the superior court, who is to enter the same on the issue docket as other causes, to be tried in the same manner and under the same rules as other cases”, and, “[t]his being so, the right of amendment existed at any stage of the cause, in all respects, whether in matter of form or of substance,” Watson v. Bishop, 69 Ga. 51, 53 (2), and that an amendment to an ordinary petition, making as additional parties plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Rattaree v. MorrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Earney v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Davis v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. Eve v. CrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API