Legal Opinion

Yip Wah v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1925No. 4598PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted under two eounts of an indictment. The first count charged them with conspiracy to receive, conceal, buy, sell, and facilitate the transportation of smoking opium. The second charged them with feloniously receiving, concealing, buying, selling, and facilitating in the transportation of certain described smoking opium, knowing the same to have been imported contrary to law.

It was shown in evidence that the plaintiffs in error, together with one Herbert M. Samuels, wont from San Francisco to Grays Harbor, and there received from a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Debs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Ruthenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Sayers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  5. Stubbs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Pon Wing Quong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  3. United States v. MyersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  4. Louis Fiano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API