Legal Opinion

Coleman v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2018No. 71052PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, PICKERING, J.:

NRS 200.604 prohibits a person from knowingly and intentionally capturing an image of another person's private area without her consent, under circumstances in which she has a reasonable expectation of privacy. The question presented is whether the statute prohibits a person from copying, without permission, a consensually recorded video depicting sexual acts. We hold that such copying does not violate NRS 200.604 and therefore reverse.

I

Coleman was arrested and charged with several crimes involving two alleged victims. After a five-day trial, the jury acquitted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Middleton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CatanioNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Buschauer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. PROTECTIVE INS. CO. v. STATE, COMM'R OF INS.Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
  2. AMAZON.COM SERVS., LLC v. MALLOY (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Ibarra v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Coleman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  5. DIAMOND NAT. RES. PROT. AND CONSERVATION ASS'N v. DIAMOND VALLEY RANCH, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API