Legal Opinion

People v. Janssen

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1925No. Docket No. 1222PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

The appellant Joiner and one Janssen were jointly charged with the crime of extortion. Joiner, who, with his codefendant, was found guilty as charged, appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The sole point upon which appellant relies for a reversal is that the only evidence tending to connect him with the crime was that of three accomplices, D. E. Edwards, Jim Chadwick and G-. W. Tucker, whose testimony was not corroborated as required by section 1111 of the Penal Code. That section, so far as applicable, reads: “A conviction cannot be had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. People v. KoeningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. People v. KempleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. People v. ReingoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. LindseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API