Legal Opinion
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 25, 1997No. 96-161TPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order 1
WEINSTEIN, Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for an order clarifying the scope of the complaint. The complaint seeks a refund of almost sixty-four million *199dollars. Specifically, plaintiff asks the court to hold that it may seek a qualified research expenditure (“QRE”) tax credit for certain research expenses of a LANTIRN prototype test unit program (amounting to ten million dollars) that were not discovered until the government initiated intensive, on-site, expert-aided discovery with respect to the LANTIRN contract. See PI. Mot. at 1-2; Def. Opp. at 1. These particular classes of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Allan J. Jablonski v. Pan American World Airways, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- TRUE v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Free-Pacheco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Parma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Cooper v. United States ex rel. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.