Parma v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
The Parmas, husband and wife, seek to recover Federal income taxes and interest collected by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the 1983 tax year. The government has moved to dismiss, arguing a fatal variance between their amended complaint and the required claim to the IRS. The parties have also filed cross motions for summary judgment on the appropriate statute of limitations.
We conclude there is no fatal variance and so deny the government’s motion to dismiss. On the merits, we agree with the government that the later statute-of limitations (October 16, 1992)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Maxwell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Liftin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- The Estate of Morton Liftin, John Liftin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013