Legal Opinion
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 26, 2000No. 99-5039PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Lockheed Martin Corporation appeals from the decisions of the United States Court of Federal Claims (1) denying Lockheed Martin’s attempt to introduce late-filed expenses in its tax refund suit, see Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States, 39 Fed.Cl. 197 (1997), and (2) granting the government’s motion for summary judgment that Lockheed Martin was not entitled to a tax credit refund for certain research expenses, see Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States, 42 Fed.Cl. 485 (1998). Because the court correctly denied Lockheed Martin’s “motion for pretrial order clarifying the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Winstar Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Burlington Northern Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Computervision Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- The Western Company of North America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Abrahamsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Muskat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.