Legal Opinion

Ogle v. Nooth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 2018No. A160243PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P.J.

*388Defendant (the superintendent) appeals a judgment granting post-conviction relief to petitioner,1 arguing that the post-conviction court erred in granting relief on a basis that petitioner did not allege in his amended petition for relief. We agree with the superintendent and reverse.

We begin by briefly reviewing the statutes governing post-conviction relief. To initiate post-conviction proceedings, a petitioner must file a petition for relief "set[ting] forth specifically the grounds upon which relief is claimed and *** stat[ing] clearly the relief desired." ORS 138.580. Upon receiving the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Ramsey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Bowen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Frazier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Ogle v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API