Ogle v. Nooth
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P.J.
*388Defendant (the superintendent) appeals a judgment granting post-conviction relief to petitioner,1 arguing that the post-conviction court erred in granting relief on a basis that petitioner did not allege in his amended petition for relief. We agree with the superintendent and reverse.
We begin by briefly reviewing the statutes governing post-conviction relief. To initiate post-conviction proceedings, a petitioner must file a petition for relief "set[ting] forth specifically the grounds upon which relief is claimed and *** stat[ing] clearly the relief desired." ORS 138.580. Upon receiving the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Ramsey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Bowen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- Frazier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Ogle v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021