Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 2000No. 98-01-29469-M; CA A106620PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The state appeals a judgment granting post-conviction relief based on the inadequacy of counsel at petitioner’s criminal trial. The state contends that the post-conviction court granted relief based on a claim not raised in the petition. We agree and reverse.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Petitioner was convicted of two counts of first-degree sodomy. Petitioner appealed, and the conviction was affirmed without opinion. State v. Bowen, 142 Or App 313, 920 P2d 180, rev den 324 Or 395 (1996). Petitioner then filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief. He alleged numerous errors…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Temple v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Brock v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Pinnell v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Hayward v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API