Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Schall

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 23, 2012No. 11–1986PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HECHT, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board brought a complaint against the respondent, James A. Sehall, alleging violations of several ethical rules as a consequence of his failure to file state income tax returns and his mishandling of a client’s criminal case. A division of this court’s grievance commission held a hearing, found Sehall violated several rules, and recommended the court impose a public reprimand. 1 Upon our de novo review, we find Schall’s conduct violated ethical rules. We suspend his license to practice law indefinitely with no possibility of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Matthew M. BolesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. GrotewoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HohenadelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. IversenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Jeffrey K. McGinnessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Paul J. BieberSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Dean A. StowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard S. KallsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API