Legal Opinion

In Re Hough

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 5, 1983No. 82-238PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBillings, C.J.

The factual circumstances giving rise to this appeal involve a confusing series of sentences imposed on petitioner-appellee by the Rutland and Windsor District Courts, as well as a post-conviction order by the Windsor Superior Court amending those sentences. As the facts are somewhat complex and are not in dispute, a brief summary will suffice: within the space of six months, appellee was convicted of two separate felonies and two misdemeanors, and the latter two misdemeanor convictions resulted in the revocation of probation imposed on the first felony. The sequence of these sentences was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SidwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  2. Emmons v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. Riddel v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. Marden v. WaltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Miner v. ChaterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SaariSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. State v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. State v. OliverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. State v. CoeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. State v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API