Legal Opinion

State v. Saari

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 15, 1989No. 86-511 and 86-512PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

In this appeal, the State consolidated two misdemeanor cases, one a driving offense and the other a simple assault on a police officer. In each case, the trial judge ignored the minimum sentence mandated by the legislature, and imposed a lesser sentence, finding that the statutory minimum sentences violated the proportionality clause of Vermont’s constitution and violated defendants’ rights to allocution. The State filed motions to reconsider the sentences, but the trial court denied the motions. The State appeals from the denial of these motions. We consider the issue as a petition for…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. State v. DannSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. State v. DeLaBruereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API