Legal Opinion

Amlie Strand Hardware Co. v. Moose

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 1929No. 27,194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action in replevin to recover possession of an automobile. The court made findings in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The two plaintiffs, retail merchants at Benson, in October, 1926, inaugurated what they designated a profit-sharing drive for new customers, to continue from October 22 to November 13. The first prize Avas a Ford coupé. There Avere other prizes. Votes were given purchasers of merchandise and coupon books, and likewise were given on the payment of overdue accounts. On a designated basis the votes could be cast…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . LipkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Hathorn v. United States Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Quatsoe v. EgglestonOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State v. MorenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. National Thrift Assn. v. Crews.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Bureau of State LotteryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Hoiby v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Wallace v. CrowleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API