Legal Opinion

State v. Moren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 9, 1892PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by Frank C. Moren from a judgment of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, Elliott, J., entered May 9,1891, that he was guilty of drawing a lottery. cited Ex parte Shobert, 70 Cal. 632; Kohn v. Koehler, 96 N. Y. 362; Yellow Stone Kit v. State, 88 Ala. 196. cited ü. S. v. Olney, 1 Abb. (U. S.). 275; Wooden v. Shot-well, 23 N. J. Law, 465, 24 N. J. Law, 789; Seidenbender v. Charles, 4 Serg. & E. 151; Bell v. State, 5 Sneed, 507, 509; Bish. St. Crimes, I 955.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

This prosecution is for an alleged violation of the statute against lotteries, and the complaint charges, in substance, that the defendant unlawfully sold to the complaining witness, for $1, a chance on certain personal property, — a suit of clothes of the value of $40, — such chance to be determined by lot between the complainant and a number of other persons, and dependent on the drawing thereafter by defendant of a lottery or scheme of chance, which said suit of clothes was then and there offered for distribution by chance among said persons and complainant, each having paid money for such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. OlneyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1868

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. . LipkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. People v. McPheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Quatsoe v. EgglestonOregon Supreme Court · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API