Legal Opinion

Hoiby v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1932No. 28,614Published

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The suit is one to recover two items of personal property — what we generally refer to as a replevin action.' The case was tried to the court and findings of fact and conclusions of law made in favor of the defendant adjudging that defendant was entitled to the return of the property, or, in case return could not be made, then that defendant have judgment against the plaintiff for $1,200, the value of the property, with interest, and for costs and disbursements.

At the commencement of the suit, plaintiff received possession of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Flint v. LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Amlie Strand Hardware Co. v. MooseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Flatner v. GoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API