Legal Opinion

Iacurci v. Sax

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 4, 2012No. AC 33318PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ESPINOSA, J.

The plaintiff, Arthur Iacurci, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Larry Sax and Cohen, Burger, Schwartz and Sax, LLC (accounting firm). The plaintiff claims that the court improperly allocated to him the burden of proof with regard to his allegation that the statute of limitations was tolled by operation of the fraudulent concealment statute. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following procedural history underlies this appeal. On November 10,2009, the plaintiff commenced an action against Sax and the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Congregation of the Passion v. Touche Ross & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Allen Realty Corp. v. HolbertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Medical Device Solutions, LLC v. AferzonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. State v. KuncikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. TD Bank, N.A. v. SalceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Davis v. Connecticut Community Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
  5. 2 National Place, LLC v. ReinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API