Legal Opinion
Woodalls, Inc. v. Varn
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 14, 1958No. 577PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
.'SHANNON, Judge.
The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit seeking to recover damages against the defendants as former City Commissioners of the City of Fort Meade. The complaint alleges that the defendants, as City Commissioners, entered into a contract with Polk Construction Company to do certain construction work for the city and as such 'Commissioners, failed to require Polk Construction Company to supply a bond as required by Chapter 255.05, Florida Statutes Annotated. The complaint also alleges that plaintiff had furnished certain asphalt materials and payment was never made by Polk…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Koenig v. Patrick Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Taylor v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Mugge v. Tampa Water Works Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Warren v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Public Instruction v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Calvin C. Campbell v. Honorable J. E. Weatherford, County Judge, Nassau County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- State ex rel. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Clutter Construction Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961