Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Clutter Construction Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 6, 1961No. 60-607PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
The State of Florida was the plaintiff and now prosecutes this appeal for the use and benefit of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, which was a materialman under a public works contract. The appellee Clutter Construction Corporation was the general contractor. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company was the surety on the performance bond required by § 255.05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.1
*22The original action was instituted pursuant to Chapter 255.05 to recover the value of materials allegedly used in the prosecution of the work provided for in the general construction contract.
During the course…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kidd v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Republic Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Fulghum & Union Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Collins v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Board of Public InstructionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. Gulf Pipeline Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Harvesters Group, Inc. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988