Legal Opinion · Dissent

Patterson Steel Co. v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1931No. 21466Published

1DissentRiley, J.

I cannot agree with the opinion of the majority wherein the term “award,” as used in our Work'men's Compensation Act, is defined. The majority opinion states:

“It is further clear that the term ‘award’ is used by the Legislature as meaning a decision or finding of the Commission, and that the question as to -whether or not the claimant was successful in getting the award in his favor, or the insurance carrier or the employer getting the award in their favor, is by no means decisive.”

It is not clear to me that the term “award” is susceptible of such a definition, for this court no longer ago…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Olentine v. CallowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Ward v. Beatrice Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API