Costello v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
Hornby, J.,
filed the following dissenting opinion.
The majority, in considering the contentions of the appellant one by one, found, among other things, no prejudicial error in the refusal of the sentencing judge to afford the appellant an opportunity to refute or discredit the information the judge had received from the former attorney of the wife concerning the previous marital difficulties that had arisen between the appellant and his wife. The finding appears to have been based in part on the assumption that the sentencing judge was influenced only by the original presentence report and not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Driver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Farrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.