Legal Opinion

Hipes & Norton, P.C. v. Pye Automobile Sales of Chattanooga, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 2002No. A02A0290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

We granted Hipes & Norton, P.C. an interlocutory appeal to review whether the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment on its suit on account against Pye Automobile Sales of Chattanooga, Inc., Pye Buick-Oldsmobile, Inc., Pyco Reinsurance, Ltd., Pye Nissan, Inc., Pye Motor Company, and Pye Automobile Sales, Inc. (collectively “the companies”). For the reasons which follow, Hipes & Norton is entitled to summary judgment. Consequently, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand.

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Birnbrey, Minsk & Minsk, LLC v. YirgaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. William J. Cooney, P.C. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Antinoro v. BrownerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Browning v. Alan Mullinax & Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. MATHEW DAVID ELLERBEE, AS OF THE ESTATE OF JACQUELINE ELLERBEE v. TOMMY DOTSONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API