Hipes & Norton, P.C. v. Pye Automobile Sales of Chattanooga, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ellington, Judge.
We granted Hipes & Norton, P.C. an interlocutory appeal to review whether the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment on its suit on account against Pye Automobile Sales of Chattanooga, Inc., Pye Buick-Oldsmobile, Inc., Pyco Reinsurance, Ltd., Pye Nissan, Inc., Pye Motor Company, and Pye Automobile Sales, Inc. (collectively “the companies”). For the reasons which follow, Hipes & Norton is entitled to summary judgment. Consequently, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand.
To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Birnbrey, Minsk & Minsk, LLC v. YirgaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- William J. Cooney, P.C. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Antinoro v. BrownerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Browning v. Alan Mullinax & Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- MATHEW DAVID ELLERBEE, AS OF THE ESTATE OF JACQUELINE ELLERBEE v. TOMMY DOTSONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026