Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Majors

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1939No. 9010PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

The legislature of Florida enacted a law to regulate the dry cleaning, dyeing and laundry industry of the state. Chapter 17894, Laws of 1937. The Act required payment of certain fees and created a Board to administer its provisions, with authority to regulate the industries and fix minimum and maximum prices for work done, in different trade areas, to be determined by the Board. The Supreme Court of Florida held the law to be valid in the case of Miami Laundry Co. et al. v. Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry Board, Fla., 183 So. 759, 119 A.L.R. 956. The Board brought a suit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States Ex Rel. Kennedy v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Miami Laundry Co. v. Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Cunningham v. SkiriotesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Majors v. McLeodDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Alek FidanianCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Fields v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  4. Ex parte SharpeDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  5. Ex parte StonefieldDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API