Legal Opinion

Fields v. City of Fairfield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1962No. 6 Div. 801, 802, 809PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Dr. Edward R. Fields and Robert Lyons were adjudged to be in contempt of circuit court because they had been found guilty of violating a temporary injunction issued by the court against them as individuals, and against the National States Rights Party, of which they were officers, enjoining them from conducting an advertised meeting in Fairfield. Field and Lyons were each fined $50 and sentenced to 5 days in jail.

Petitioners “appealed” their judgment of conviction to this court and later their attorney “discovered that writ of certiorari is the proper remedy in this case,”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Worden v. SearlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Ex parte DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Paul v. LOUISIANA STATE EMPLOYEES'GROUPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Lightsey v. Kensington Mortgage and Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Ex Parte AbercrombieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Ex Parte AbercrombieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API