Allen v. Luke
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
In Equity. On demurrer to amended bill.
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, Circuit Judge.
The receiver of a national bank brought a bill in equity against certain of its former directors to recover money lost to the bank through their alleged misconduct. The defendants demurred to the bill, and the demurrers were sustained. 141 Eed. 694. The complainant thereafter amended his bill. The creditors of the bank have been paid in full, and the stockholders’ agent has been admitted to these proceedings as party complainant, instead of the receiver. The amended bill alleges that the defendants are liable:
A. For violations of the banking act: (1) In respect of unpaid *1019…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yates v. Jones National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- von Arnim v. American Tube WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Warren v. Para Rubber Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Boyd v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- Stephens v. OverstolzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Crews v. GarberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Holman v. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Spring v. WebbDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1915
- Williams v. BradyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.