Legal Opinion

State v. Bey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 2, 1988PublishedCited by 213 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

This case, and State v. Bey, 112 N.J. 123 (1988) (Bey II), also decided today, are both pre-jEamseur/Biegenwald capital prosecutions. We address certain trial errors in this case and hold that defendant must be retried. Additionally, since the Legislature has amended the capital punishment statute to preclude imposing the death sentence on juveniles, we conclude that capital resentencing is barred in this case. In Bey II defendant’s convictions are affirmed, but principles established in Ramseur [State v. Ramseur, 106 N.J. 123] and Biegenwald…

2Cases cited104 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by213 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. State v. DiFriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API