Legal Opinion
In re Pollak
Paulding County Court of Common Pleas
Decided March 6, 1962No. 18875PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHitchcock, J.
In this appeal from an order of the Ohio State Board of Pharmacy this court this day made a finding, in pertinent part, reading as follows:
ÍÍ* # A
“7. b. That on hearing of this appeal on September 22, 1961, evidence aliunde the record was received bearing on the issue raised by appellant to the effect that he was not accorded ‘due course of law’ or ‘due process of law’ in the proceedings leading to Ms plea of ‘guilty’ in said criminal cause No. 2700 aforementioned.
“8. That from the evidence and from the Court’s definite recollection of the conduct of the prosecuting officials at the trial, it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- McNeal v. CulverSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Will v. McCoyOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Barnhardt v. LinzellOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- State Board of Pharmacy v. GaffordOhio Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re WilliamsonPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1969
- In re Appeal of Ohio Sportservice, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1976
- City of Cleveland v. WhipkeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1972