In re Williamson
Paulding County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtHitchcock, J.
An Ohio State Highway patrolman arrested appellant about 7:55 o’clock p. m., March 6, 1968, on a charge of driving while under the influence of alcohol. Section 4511.19, Revised Code. The patrolman showed and read to appellant the explanation required by the “Implied Consent Statute” (Section 4511.191, Revised Code). In response to the concluding question, “Will you now give me a specimen of (blood — urine—breath) for analysis to determine your concentration of alcohol?” the patrolman wrote the appellant’s answer was, “No.”
The patrolman then made his affidavit before the Deputy Clerk of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of Westerville v. CunninghamOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. MuzzySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Marbut v. Motor Vehicle Department of Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Korsak v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- City of Dayton v. NugentCity of Dayton Municipal Court · 1970
- Hoban v. RiceOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
- Groff v. RiceOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
- In re of NonemanPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.