Legal Opinion

State Board of Pharmacy v. Gafford

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1930No. 22204PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This case comes into this court by petition in error from the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county, affirming the judgment of the court of common pleas, wherein the action of the state board of pharmacy in refusing to renew Gafford’s certificate authorizing him to practice pharmacy in the state of Ohio was held to be an abuse of discretion, and said board was ordered forthwith to issue to the applicant a renewal of his certificate authorizing him to practice pharmacy in this state.

The action of the board in refusing to issue such certificate was pursuant to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Black v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Firestone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. In re PollakPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API