Legal Opinion

Martin v. Trautz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1922No. Docket No. 141PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Mayne (Frederick W.), J., presiding. Bill by Harry J. Martin and another, copartners as the H. J. Martin Company, against Michael Trautz and others to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. The Hamtramck Lumber & Supply Company filed a cross-bill to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. From a decree for plaintiff and cross-plaintiff, defendants Trautz appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff, the H. J. Martin Company, and the cross-plaintiff, the Hamtramck Lumber & Supply Company, filed mechanics’ liens on October 17, 1919, and November 17, 1919, respectively, the former for $522.37 with interest, and the latter for $405.97 with interest, on the property owned by Michael Trautz and Kathryn Trautz, husband and wife. From a decree in favor of the appellees the case is brought here by the appellants by an appeal.

It is the contention of the defendants that the service of the order establishing the Martin Company lien under this claim was defective, counsel citing Hannah…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smalley v. Northwestern Terra-Cotta Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hannah & Lay Mercantile Co. v. MosserMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Acme Lumber Co. v. Modern Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Zilz v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. William Moors, Inc. v. Pine Lake Shopping Center, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API