Legal Opinion

James F. Armstrong v. Dewie Rushing

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1965No. 20055_1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

James F. Armstrong commenced this action against Dewie Rushing to recover damages under the Civil Rights Act, R.S. § 1979 (1875), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1964). The district court, on its own motion, and before issuance or service of process upon defendant, dismissed the complaint without leave to amend. Armstrong then took this appeal. 1

In his complaint Armstrong alleged as follows: he was arrested on a charge of assault with a deadly weapon. On January 29, 1953, while he was being arraigned on that charge, he was served with another complaint charging assault by means of…

2Cited by46 opinions

  1. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Edward G. Eldridge v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Harry Franklin v. State of Oregon, State Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API