Legal Opinion

Hoy v. Biladeau

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage upon real property situated in Deschutes County, Oregon. Defendants appeal from a decree in favor of plaintiff.

For the purpose of giving plaintiff security for the payment of their promissory note for $7,000, payable to the order of plaintiff in annual installments of $1,000 and accrued interest, defendants on September 12, 1918, executed and delivered to plaintiff a mortgage upon 160 acres of land, and certain water rights *593appurtenant thereto, title to which stood in the name of the defendant, Mildred Biladeau.

On the same date, as additional security…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearce v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Pettit v. LouisNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Megown v. FullerWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Windsor Trust Co. v. ChampignySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Maxine Devlin Moore v. John C. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Bankers' Discount Corp. v. NoeOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Oakman v. Hurd Lumber & Woodwork Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API